Clinical Supervision of Medical Students

Purpose

To ensure safety of patients and learners, and a supportive environment for student learning and growth in the clinical setting.

Overview

In keeping with our combined duties to patient care/safety and education of students in the practice of medicine, and in keeping with accreditation requirements, this policy describes the requirements to meet the standard of appropriate supervision in the clinical environment.

Related LCME Standards

9.2: Faculty Appointments

9.3: Clinical Supervision of Medical Students

Principles

At UCSF, we value the role of learners in the provision of excellent clinical care. We also embrace the educational principle of graded responsibility to maximally support learners in their development of clinical expertise. We believe that appropriate supervision is also critical to performing assessments of the learner and providing meaningful feedback.

Policy

Students of the UCSF School of Medicine must be appropriately supervised when participating in required or elective clinical activities.

  1. Medical students may not provide care in an unsupervised fashion.
  2. Supervisors must either hold a faculty appointment or receive oversight in their teaching and assessment role by a faculty member. Supervisors may include physicians, residents, fellows, and other licensed health professionals supervising an activity within their scope of expertise or practice.
  3. Students may be supervised at one of three  levels, as determined by the supervisor:
    1. Direct observation: the supervisor is present with the student and the patient
    2. Immediately available indirect supervision: the supervisor, while not in the presence of the student and/or patient, is immediately available to the learner and/or at the site of care to provide direct supervision if necessary
    3. Telemedicine supervision will abide by the same rules as in-person.
  4. The appropriate level of supervision must be determined by the supervisor and must be consistent with patient and learner safety, the clerkship or rotation objectives, the student's level of training, and the student's demonstrated competence. In determining the appropriate level of supervision, the supervisor should consider:
    1. the student's level of training;
    2. the student's prior experience and demonstrated skill with clinical activity;
    3. the supervisor's familiarity with the student's abilities; and 
    4. the acuity and complexity of the clinical situation and the potential risk to the patient
  5. The following expectations provide general guidance by phase training:
    1. Foundations 2 (Early Clerkships):  Indirect supervision (with direct supervision available if necessary) is acceptable for history-taking and examination for specific clinical situations and clerkships. Direct supervision is required for procedures and clinical decision-making.  
    2. Career Launch (Late Clerkships/Advanced Electives): Indirect supervision acceptable for history-taking and management proposals; direct supervision required for invasive procedures and final clinical decisions. 
    3. Acting Internships: Students are expected to function with increased autonomy, proposing management plans to patients under indirect supervision, but all plans must be reviewed and co-signed by a licensed physician. 
  6.  Students may not perform procedures without direct supervision.
  7. The Office of Medical Education informs all faculty with supervisory responsibilities of supervision expectations via a centralized annual policy attestation monitoring process as outlined in the Orientation to Teaching Responsibilities policy.
  8. The Office of Medical Education/Educational Evaluation unit monitors each clerkship’s quality of supervision through the review of data from clerkship evaluation and national surveys, including data on the sufficiency of direct observation, mid-clerkship feedback, and clinical educator effectiveness ratings.

Procedure

  1. The supervisor reviews and independently verifies all student findings, assessments, and care plans, and documents this review.
  2. It is the faculty supervisor’s role to ensure that any non-physicians who are engaged in clinical teaching for any student are acting within their scope of practice.
  3. The Clerkship Evaluation form completed by students includes questions that assess sufficiency of supervision. Clerkship evaluations include questions on the sufficiency of observation, quality of feedback, and discussion of mid-clerkship feedback. This data is reviewed by the Associate Dean for Curriculum, and Director of Foundations 2 and discussed twice a year at the Foundations 2 Operations Committee. The Committee on Curriculum Operations reviews full reports during the annual Phase 2 review. 
  4. In addition to the centralized monitoring process outlined above, the clerkship/course director is responsible for re-communicating the school’s standard procedures through which students can report concerns regarding adequate and appropriate supervision of what they may deem a violation of this policy during clerkship orientations.

Accountable Dean or Director: Associate Dean for Curriculum, Foundations 2/CL Director, and Clerkship Director 

Approval Date and Governing Body: October 13, 2026, CCEP

Related Policies

  1. Medical Student Documentation Policy
  2. Orientation to Teaching Roles and Responsibilities