Clinical and Radiographic Factors Associated With Failed Renal Angioembolization: Results From the Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study (Mi-GUTS).

2020
https://researcherprofiles.org/profile/156056997
33129870
Armas-Phan M, Keihani S, Agochukwu-Mmonu N, Cohen AJ, Rogers DM, Wang SS, Gross JA, Joyce RP, Hagedorn JC, Voelzke B, Moses RA, Sensenig RL, Selph JP, Gupta S, Baradaran N, Erickson BA, Schwartz I, Elliott SP, Mukherjee K, Smith BP, Santucci RA, Burks FN, Dodgion CM, Carrick MM, Askari R, Majercik S, Nirula R, Myers JB, Breyer BN
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find clinical or radiographic factors that are associated with angioembolization failure after high-grade renal trauma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were selected from the Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study. Included were patients who initially received renal angioembolization after high-grade renal trauma (AAST grades III-V). This cohort was dichotomized into successful or failed angioembolization. Angioembolization was considered a failure if angioembolization was followed by repeat angiography and/or an exploratory laparotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients underwent management initially with angioembolization, with failure in 18 (27%) patients. Those with failed angioembolization had a larger proportion ofgrade IV (72% vs 53%) and grade V (22% vs 12%) renal injuries. A total of 53 patients underwent renal angioembolization and had initial radiographic data for review, with failure in 13 cases. The failed renal angioembolization group had larger perirenal hematoma sizes on the initial trauma scan.

CONCLUSION

Angioembolization after high-grade renal trauma failed in 27% of patients. Failed angioembolization was associated with higher injury grade and a larger perirenal hematoma. Likely these characteristics are associated with high-grade renal trauma that may be less amenable to successful treatment after a single renal angioembolization.

Journal Issue
Volume 148