Video-Based Assessments of Colonoscopy Inspection Quality Correlate With Quality Metrics and Highlight Areas for Improvement.

2018
https://researcherprofiles.org/profile/15012127
29908363
Duloy A, Yadlapati RH, Benson M, Gawron AJ, Kahi CJ, Kaltenbach TR, McClure J, Gregory DL, Keswani RN
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) vary significantly among colonoscopists. Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) is the quality with which a colonoscopist inspects for polyps and may explain some of this variation. We aimed to determine the relationship between CIQ and historical ADRs and SDRs in a cohort of colonoscopists and assess whether there is variation in CIQ components (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) among colonoscopists with similar ADRs and SDRs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to assess CIQ among 17 high-volume colonoscopists at an academic medical center. Over 6 weeks, we video-recorded >28 colonoscopies per colonoscopist and randomly selected 7 colonoscopies per colonoscopist for evaluation. Six raters graded CIQ using an established scale, with a maximum whole colon score of 75.

RESULTS

We evaluated 119 colonoscopies. The median whole-colon CIQ score was 50.1/75. Whole-colon CIQ score (r=0.71; P.01) and component scores (fold examination r=0.74; cleaning r=0.67; distension r=0.77; all P.01) correlated with ADR. Proximal colon CIQ score (r=0.67; P.01) and component scores (fold examination r=0.71; cleaning r=0.62; distension r=0.65; all P.05) correlated with SDR. CIQ component scores differed significantly between colonoscopists with similar ADRs and SDRs for most of the CIQ skills.

CONCLUSION

In a prospective observational study, we found CIQ and CIQ components to correlate with ADR and SDR. Colonoscopists with similar ADRs and SDRs differ in their performance of the 3 CIQ components-specific, actionable feedback might improve colonoscopy technique.

Journal Issue
Volume 17 of Issue 4