Recent Publications by CFE Educators

BACKGROUND

Identifying priority challenges of older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to designing interventions aimed at improving their well-being and independence.

OBJECTIVE

To prioritize challenges of older adults with COPD and those who care for them to guide refinement of a telephonic nurse coach intervention for patients with COPD and their family caregivers (EPIC: Empowering People to Independence in COPD).

DESIGN

Multiphase study guided by Baltes Theory of Successful Aging and the 5Ms Framework: Phase 1: Nominal group technique (NGT), a structured process of prioritizing responses to a question through group consensus. Phase 2: Rapid qualitative analysis. Phase 3: Intervention mapping and refinement.

SETTING

Ambulatory, virtual.

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults with COPD, family caregivers, clinic staff (nurses, respiratory therapists), clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners), and health system leaders.

RESULTS

NGT sessions were conducted by constituency group with 37 participants (n = 7 patients, n = 6 family caregivers, n = 8 clinic staff, n = 9 clinicians, n = 7 health system leaders) (Phase 1). Participants generated 92 statements across five themes (Phase 2): (1) "Barriers to care", (2) "Family caregiver needs", (3) "Functional status and mobility issues", (4) "Illness understanding", and (5) "COPD care complexities". Supplemental oxygen challenges emerged as a critical problem, and prioritized challenges differed by group. Patients and clinic staff prioritized "Functional status and mobility issues", family caregivers prioritized "Family caregiver needs", and clinicians and health system leaders prioritized "COPD care complexities". Intervention mapping (Phase 3) guided EPIC refinement focused on meeting patient priorities of independence and mobility but accounting for all priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

Diverse constituency groups identified priority challenges for older adults with COPD. Functional status and mobility issues, particularly related to supplemental oxygen, emerged as patient prioritized challenges.

IMPLICATIONS

Patient-centered interventions for older adults with COPD must account for their prioritized functional and supplemental oxygen needs and explore diverse constituent perspectives to facilitate intervention enrichment.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects up to 4% of the adult population. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) was approved by the FDA in 2014 as a treatment option for patients with moderate to severe OSA who cannot tolerate CPAP and, since that time, studies have focused on predicting response to this therapy. This review summarizes the relevant literature assessing factors that predict HNS success including therapeutic response and device adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a consensual definition for the term 'early axial spondyloarthritis-axSpA'-and 'early peripheral spondyloarthritis-pSpA'.

METHODS

The ASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-Spondyloarthritis EARly definition) steering committee convened an international working group (WG). Five consecutive steps were followed: (1) systematic literature review (SLR); (2) discussion of SLR results within the WG and ASAS community; (3) a three-round Delphi survey inviting all ASAS members to select the items that should be considered for the definition; (4) presentation of Delphi results to the WG and ASAS community and (5) ASAS voting and endorsement (2023 annual meeting).

RESULTS

Following the SLR, consensus was to proceed with an expert-based definition for early axSpA (81% in favour) but not for pSpA (54% against). Importantly, early axSpA should be based on symptom duration taking solely axial symptoms into account. 151-164 ASAS members participated in the Delphi surveys. Consensus was achieved for considering the following items within early axSpA definition: duration of symptoms ≤2 years; axial symptoms defined as cervical/thoracic/back/buttock pain or morning stiffness; regardless of the presence/absence of radiographic damage. The WG agreed that in patients with a diagnosis of axSpA 'early axSpA' should be defined as a duration of ≤2 years of axial symptoms. Axial symptoms should include spinal/buttock pain or morning stiffness and should be considered by a rheumatologist as related to axSpA. The ASAS community endorsed this proposal (88% in favour).

CONCLUSIONS

Early axSpA has newly been defined, based on expert consensus. This ASAS definition should be adopted in research studies addressing early axSpA.

BACKGROUND

A metaphor conceptualizes one, typically abstract, experience in terms of another, more concrete, experience with the goal of making it easier to understand. Although combat metaphors have been well described in some health contexts, they have not been well characterized in the setting of critical illness.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How do clinicians use combat metaphors when describing critically ill patients and families in the electronic health record?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We included notes written about patients aged 18 years or older admitted to ICUs within a large hospital system from 2012 through 2020. We developed a lexicon of combat words and isolated note segments that contained any combat mentions. Combat mentions were defined systematically as a metaphor or not across two coders. Among combat metaphors, we used a grounded theory approach to construct a conceptual framework around their use.

RESULTS

Across 6,404 combat-related mentions, 5,970 were defined as metaphors (Cohen κ, 0.84). The most common metaphors were "bout" (26.2% of isolated segments), "combat" (18.5%), "confront" (17.8%), and "struggle" (17.5%). We present a conceptual framework highlighting how combat metaphors can present as identity ("mom is a fighter") and process constructs ("struggling to breathe"). Identity constructs usually were framed around: (1) hope, (2) internal strength, (3) contextualization of current illness based on prior experiences, or (4) a combination thereof. Process constructs were used to describe: (1) "fighting for" (eg, working toward) a goal, (2) "fighting against" an unwanted force, or (3) experiencing internal turmoil.

INTERPRETATION

We provide a novel conceptual framework around the use of combat metaphors in the ICU. Further studies are needed to understand intentionality behind their use and how they impact clinician behaviors and patient and caregiver emotional responses.