Recent Publications by CFE Educators

Recent Published articles, books, and other scholarship by Academy members, CFE Education Scientists, and CFE Faculty.
Palliative Care Initiated in the Emergency Department: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
2025
Authors: Grudzen CR, Siman N, Cuthel AM, Adeyemi O, Yamarik RL, Goldfeld KS, PRIM-ER Investigators, Abella BS, Bellolio F, Bourenane S, Brody AA, Cameron-Comasco L, Chodosh J, Cooper JJ, Deutsch AL, Elie MC, Elsayem A, Fernandez R, Fleischer-Black J, Gang M, Genes N, Goett R, Heaton H, Hill J, Horwitz L, Isaacs E, Jubanyik K, Lamba S, Lawrence K, Lin M, Loprinzi-Brauer C, Madsen T, Miller J, Modrek A, Otero R, Ouchi K, Richardson C, Richardson LD, Ryan M, Schoenfeld E, Shaw M, Shreves A, Southerland LT, Tan A, Uspal J, Venkat A, Walker L, Wittman I, Zimny E
Inverse dose protraction effects of high-LET radiation: evidence and significance.
2025
Authors: Hamada N, Matsuya Y, Zablotska LB, Little MP
Biological effects of ionizing radiation vary with radiation quality, which is often expressed as the amount of energy deposited per unit length, i.e., linear energy transfer (LET). For acute irradiation, high-LET radiation generally produces greater biological effects than low-LET radiation, but little knowledge exists as to how dose protraction modifies effects. In this regard, inverse dose protraction effects (IDPEs) are phenomena in which dose protraction enhances effects, contrasting with sparing dose protraction effects in which dose protraction reduces effects. Here, we review the current knowledge on IDPEs of high-LET radiation. To the best of our knowledge, since 1967, 80 biology or epidemiology papers have reported IDPEs following external or internal high-LET irradiation with neutrons, deuterons, α-particles, light ions, or heavy ions. IDPEs of high-LET radiation have been described for biochemical changes in cell-free macromolecules, neoplastic transformation, cell death, DNA damage responses and gene expression changes in mammalian cell cultures of human or rodent origin, gene mutations, cytogenetic changes, cancer, non-cancer effects (e.g., testicular effects, cataracts, cardiovascular diseases) and life shortening in non-human mammals (rodents and dogs), and induction of lung cancer and bone tumors in humans. For external irradiation of mammalian cells in vitro and mammals in vivo, IDPEs of low- and high-LET radiation have been reported for radiation doses spanning in excess of three or four orders of magnitude in slightly different ranges, and for radiation dose rates both spanning over six orders of magnitude in different ranges. IDPEs of high-LET radiation in humans have been reported following internal exposure, but not external exposure. Manifestations and mechanisms of IDPEs of high-LET radiation are far less understood than those of low-LET radiation, warranting further studies that will be pivotal to assess the implications for radiation protection.
View on PubMedDocking 14 million virtual isoquinuclidines against the mu and kappa opioid receptors reveals dual antagonists-inverse agonists with reduced withdrawal effects.
2025
Authors: Vigneron SF, Ohno S, Braz J, Kim JY, Kweon OS, Webb C, Billesbølle C, Bhardwaj K, Irwin J, Manglik A, Basbaum AI, Ellman JA, Shoichet BK
Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: Results from a national multi-center prospective cohort study.
2025
Authors: Xu E, Tabrizian P, Gutierrez J, Hoteit M, Ghaziani T, Zhou K, Parikh N, Ajmera V, Aby E, Shui A, Marino R, Martin A, Wong C, Kao K, Dave S, Florman S, Yao F, Mehta N
Weight-Based Health Care Discrimination and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Black Sexual and Gender Minoritized Assigned Female at Birth Adults in the United States.
2025
Authors: Singh S, Mehta N, Noh M, Bond K, Threats M, Jackson JW, Nnawulezi N, Mercedes M, Agénor M
Inverse dose protraction effects of low-LET radiation: evidence and significance.
2025
Authors: Hamada N, Matsuya Y, Zablotska LB, Little MP
Biological effects of ionizing radiation vary not merely with total dose but also with temporal dose distribution. Sparing dose protraction effects, in which dose protraction reduces effects of radiation have widely been accepted and generally assumed in radiation protection, particularly for stochastic effects (e.g., solid cancer). In contrast, inverse dose protraction effects (IDPEs) in which dose protraction enhances radiation effects have not been well recognized, nor comprehensively reviewed. Here, we review the current knowledge on IDPEs of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. To the best of our knowledge, since 1952, 157 biology, epidemiology or clinical papers have reported IDPEs following external or internal low-LET irradiation with photons (X-rays, γ-rays), β-rays, electrons, protons or helium ions. IDPEs of low-LET radiation have been described for biochemical changes in cell-free macromolecules (DNA, proteins or lipids), DNA damage responses in bacteria and yeasts, DNA damage, cytogenetic changes, neoplastic transformation and cell death in mammalian cell cultures of human, rodent or bovine origin, mutagenesis in silkworms, cytogenetic changes, induction of cancer (solid tumors and leukemia) and non-cancer effects (male sterility, cataracts and diseases of the circulatory system), tumor inactivation and survival in non-human mammals (rodents, rabbits, dogs and pigs), and induction of cancer and non-cancer effects (skin changes and diseases of the circulatory system) in humans. In contrast to a growing body of phenomenological evidence for manifestations of IDPEs, there is limited knowledge on mechanistic underpinnings, but proposed mechanisms involve cell cycle-dependent resensitization and low dose hyper-radiosensitivity. These necessitate continued studies for further mechanistic developments and assessment of implications of scientific evidence for radiation protection (e.g., in terms of a dose rate effectiveness factor).
View on PubMedEarly Results of Implementing Rapid Methadone Titration for Hospitalized Patients: A Case Series.
2025
Authors: Martin M, Baisey T, Skinner S, Ly L, Slown K, Harter K, Nguyen OK, Steiger S, Suen LW
Response to: 'Is the practice of case-tracking a substitute for traditional feedback?'
2025
Authors: Minter DJ, Frank AK, Pierce L, Schwartz B, Narayana S
Response to: 'A confidentiality conundrum: Case tracking for medical education'.
2025
Authors: Minter DJ, Frank AK, Pierce L, Schwartz B, Narayana S
Twelve tips on applying AI tools in HPE scholarship using Boyer's model.
2025
Authors: Benjamin J, Masters K, Agrawal A, MacNeill H, Mehta N