Recent Publications by CFE Educators

OBJECTIVE

To measure the latency of laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) motion onset at 2 laryngopharyngeal subsites using calibrated aesthesiometers.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Academic institution.

METHODS

Twenty-one asymptomatic, healthy subjects (11 male, 10 female) underwent laryngopharyngeal sensory testing with tactile stimuli delivered to the aryepiglottic fold and medial pyriform sinus using 30-mm Cheung-Bearelly monofilaments (4-0 and 5-0 nylon sutures) via channeled flexible laryngoscope. The LAR onset latency, defined as the first visual detection of ipsilateral vocal fold adduction following tactile stimulation, was measured with frame-by-frame analysis of video recordings.

RESULTS

The overall mean LAR latency across both subsites and stimulation forces was 176.6 (95% CI, 170.3-183.0) ms, without significant difference between subsites or forces. The critical value for LAR response latency prolongation at the .01 significance level was 244 ms. At 30 frames/s video capture resolution, LAR response latency ≥8 frame intervals would indicate abnormal prolongation.

CONCLUSION

Aesthesiometer-triggered LAR latency appears to be invariant over an 8.7-dB force range and between the aryepiglottic fold and medial pyriform sinus subsites in controls. Laryngeal adductor reflex latency incongruences between stimulation forces or laryngopharyngeal subsites may serve as pathophysiological features to dissect mechanisms of upper aerodigestive tract disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3B.

A remarkable molecular and functional heterogeneity of the primary sensory neurons and dorsal horn interneurons transmits pain- and or itch-relevant information, but the molecular signature of the projection neurons that convey the messages to the brain is unclear. Here, using retro-TRAP (translating ribosome affinity purification) and RNA sequencing, we reveal extensive molecular diversity of spino- and trigeminoparabrachial projection neurons. Among the many genes identified, we highlight distinct subsets of -, -, -, and -expressing projection neurons. By combining in situ hybridization of retrogradely labeled neurons with Fos-based assays, we also demonstrate significant functional heterogeneity, including both convergence and segregation of pain- and itch-provoking inputs into molecularly diverse subsets of NK1R- and non-NK1R-expressing projection neurons.

OBJECTIVES

To compare treatment outcomes for sinogenic subdural empyema (SE) between those managed with initial endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) alone versus those treated with a combination of ESS and craniotomy over the last decade at our institution. To better characterize subdural empyema with regard to presentation, causative pathogens, and treatment course.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center chart review to identify and evaluate pediatric SE patients between 2009 and 2019. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were classified in one of two groups: those who initially underwent ESS or frontal trephination without concurrent neurosurgical procedure and those who underwent craniotomy or burr hole in addition to a sinus procedure. Presenting characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. The ESS alone and the ESS + craniotomy subgroups each had 9 patients with similar baseline characteristics. The ESS + craniotomy group was more likely to present with neurological symptoms (p = 0.039) and have multiple intracranial fluid collections (p = 0.046). 74.1% of patients presented to the Emergency Department (ED) or to their primary medical doctor and were treated with outpatient management prior to hospitalization with definitive surgical management. The most common presenting symptoms were fever, headache and nausea/vomiting. There were no differences between treatment groups in rate of return to the operating room (OR) (p = 1.00), length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.553), or adverse neurological outcomes (p = 0.456). 44.4% of patients in the ESS alone group eventually required neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical SE patients often present to medical professionals in the primary care setting or ED and are managed with outpatient treatment before admission with definitive treatment. In this small retrospective cohort patients who underwent sinus intervention alone had similar rates of return to OR, LOS and adverse neurological outcomes use as those who underwent a sinus procedure in coordination with a neurosurgical intervention. There may be a group of patients with SE who may be managed with endoscopic procedures alone and further studies should seek to determine the characteristics of this population.