Recent Publications by CFE Educators

PURPOSE

Patients with lung cancer and brain metastases represent a markedly heterogeneous population. Accurate prognosis is essential to optimally individualize care. In prior publications, we described the graded prognostic assessment (GPA), but a GPA for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has never been reported, and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effect of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was unknown. The 3-fold purpose of this work is to provide the initial report of an SCLC GPA, to evaluate the effect of PD-L1 on survival in patients with NSCLC, and to update the Lung GPA accordingly.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multivariable analysis of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival was performed on 4183 patients with lung cancer (3002 adenocarcinoma, 611 nonadenocarcinoma, 570 SCLC) with newly diagnosed brain metastases between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Significant variables were used to update the Lung GPA.

RESULTS

Overall median survival for lung adenocarcinoma, SCLC, and nonadenocarcinoma was 17, 10, and 8 months, respectively, but varied widely by GPA from 2 to 52 months. In SCLC, the significant prognostic factors were age, performance status, extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases. In NSCLC, the distribution of molecular markers among patients with lung adenocarcinoma and known primary tumor molecular status revealed alterations/expression in PD-L1 50% to 100%, PD-L1 1% to 49%, epidermal growth factor receptor, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase in 32%, 31%, 30%, and 7%, respectively. Median survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases with 0, 1% to 49%, and ≥50% PD-L1 expression was 17, 19, and 24 months, respectively (P .01), confirming PD-L1 is a prognostic factor. Previously identified prognostic factors for NSCLC (epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase status, performance status, age, number of brain metastases, and extracranial metastases) were reaffirmed. These factors were incorporated into the updated Lung GPA with robust separation between subgroups for all histologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for patients with lung cancer and brain metastases has improved but varies widely. The initial report of a GPA for SCLC is presented. For patients with NSCLC-adenocarcinoma and brain metastases, PD-L1 is a newly identified significant prognostic factor, and the previously identified factors were reaffirmed. The updated indices establish unique criteria for SCLC, NSCLC-nonadenocarcinoma, and NSCLC-adenocarcinoma (incorporating PD-L1). The updated Lung GPA, available for free at brainmetgpa.com, provides an accurate tool to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of pediatric Osia 2® System placements.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of primary and revision Osia 2® System surgical cases at two tertiary academic children's hospitals. Operative details and post-operative surgical and audiologic outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

18 cases were performed on 14 children (mean age: 11.5 years, range 7-16) and included 9 primary surgeries and 9 revisions from BAHA Attract®, Connect® and Sophono® implants. Surgical planning for revision surgeries was complex due to prior incisions, implants, and bony contour. Post-operative aided audiograms revealed pure tone average (0.5-4 kHz) of 26.2 ± 2.5 dB HL (mean ± SD), with no high frequency roll-off (8 kHz aided threshold: 23.8 ± 7.5 dB HL). Two minor post-operative complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

Bone-conduction hearing devices (BCHDs) are used to improve access to sound for children with conductive hearing loss, single-sided deafness, and aural atresia. Traditional passive, percutaneous abutment-based and transcutaneous magnet-based surgical BCHDs can be limited by skin complications and high-frequency acoustic attenuation. Recent availability of active, transcutaneous osseointegrated BCHD systems presents potential for improvement on both of these traditional limitations. Initial experience with the Osia 2® System demonstrates overall successful, uncomplicated placement with excellent audiologic outcomes. Revision cases require careful surgical planning. Further follow-up and comparative studies with other BCHDs are necessary to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the Osia 2® System.

Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding ("baseline") and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %-53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %-24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %,  = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %,  = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min,   0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %,  = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %,  = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists.