Recent Publications by CFE Educators

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) remain poorly understood. Social disadvantage may have a cumulative impact on health, with recent analyses using combined scoring systems to measure their impact on outcomes. Our aim was to investigate cumulative social disadvantage on childhood arthritis by using a cumulative score to analyze its association with arthritis among a nationally representative sample of children.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of the National Survey of Children's Health (2016-2019) was performed. A cumulative social disadvantage score was generated (1 point each, with a maximum score of 4): low guardian education (high school or less), low household income level (0-199% of federal poverty level), underinsured status (public or uninsured), and high adverse childhood experience (ACE) score (≥4). Univariate and multivariable (adjusting for age, sex, and race and ethnicity) logistic regression models were used to measure the association between cumulative social risk and the odds of an arthritis diagnosis and moderate-to-severe parent-reported arthritis severity.

RESULTS

Of 131,774 surveys completed, a total of 365 children reported current arthritis. Cumulative social disadvantage was associated with an arthritis diagnosis, with the highest odds among those with a score of 4 (adjusted odds ratio [OR ] 12.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.9-53.3]). Cumulative social disadvantage also was associated with increased odds of moderate-to-severe arthritis severity (OR 12.4 [95% CI 1.8-82.6]).

CONCLUSION

In this nationally representative sample, accumulated social disadvantage, measured via a cumulative social disadvantage score based on income level, guardian education, insurance status, and ACE exposure, was associated with an arthritis diagnosis and moderate-to-severe arthritis severity.

BACKGROUND

Daycare and school closures prompted by shelter-in-place orders may have increased opportunities for unintentional ingestions among young children.

OBJECTIVES

We examined emergency department (ED) presentations for toxic exposures among young children during the COVID-19 pandemic in the San Francisco Bay Area, which had some of the strictest and most prolonged shelter-in-place policies in the United States.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of children 0 to 5 years of age who presented with an ED International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis code of toxic exposure within a tertiary care hospital system between March 16, 2016 and March 15, 2021. We considered the period after March 16, 2020 to represent the pandemic.

RESULTS

During the pandemic, the absolute number of poisonings among young children remained stable. Overall, ED encounters within this cohort decreased by 55%, which doubled the relative toxic exposure rate per 1000 ED encounters from 4.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.19-5.90) to 9.79 (95% CI 8.09-11.49). Rates of admission, severe medical complications, operating room case requests, and length of stay were not significantly different. Shelter-in-place was associated with significantly higher odds of cannabis ingestion (odds ratio = 2.70, 95% CI 1.60-4.49).

CONCLUSION

Despite dramatic decreases in overall ED patient volumes, the absolute number and severity of toxic exposures were similar during the pandemic compared with previous years. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that predominantly affects the axial skeleton, although it can affect peripheral joints, and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations also occur. Historically, axSpA was thought to be a disease predominantly seen in men, although with the advent of magnetic resonance imaging techniques and advances in research, this dogma has been challenged and refuted. Sex and gender are different concepts, and both can have a role in disease. In axSpA, consideration of the influence of sex and gender on the disease phenotype is necessary to predict outcomes and to enable the development of therapeutic approaches that are best suited to individual patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient-reported care utilization and outcomes among young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), including factors associated with complete transfer to adult rheumatology.

METHODS

We included young adults with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry from 2015 to 2019 with age ≥ 18 years at their last clinical site visit. We used data from the CARRA Registry Long-term Follow-up program, which follows inactive CARRA Registry patients and collects patient-reported information through phone surveys. We compared the characteristics of respondents with complete and incomplete transfer to adult rheumatology care at their first Long-term Follow-up phone survey.

RESULTS

We identified 540 young adults with JIA; 187 (35%) responded to the Long-term Follow-up phone survey. The 54% of respondents with complete transfer to adult rheumatology were slightly older and reported more self-assessed disease activity, morning stiffness, and pain compared to those with incomplete transfer. Biologic use was high at both timepoints and did not differ by transfer status. Patients who completed the transfer were more likely to have private insurance and be actively pursuing postsecondary education compared to those with an incomplete transfer. Across the cohort, 65% reported problems with pain or discomfort and 45% with anxiety or depression.

CONCLUSION

Young adult respondents with JIA in the CARRA Registry commonly report persistent medication use, but still report more problems with pain as compared to population norms. Additional work is needed to understand how best to address comorbid pain around the period of transition to adult care.