Recent Publications by CFE Educators

Recent Published articles, books, and other scholarship by Academy members, CFE Education Scientists, and CFE Faculty.
Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort.
2022
Authors: Glencer AC, Miller PN, Greenwood H, Maldonado Rodas CK, Freimanis R, Basu A, Mukhtar RA, Brabham C, Kim P, Hwang ES, Rosenbluth JM, Hirst GL, Campbell MJ, Borowsky AD, Esserman LJ
UNLABELLED
Ductal carcinoma (DCIS) is a biologically heterogenous entity with uncertain risk for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) development. Standard treatment is surgical resection often followed by radiation. New approaches are needed to reduce overtreatment. This was an observational study that enrolled patients with DCIS who chose not to pursue surgical resection from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic medical center. All patients underwent breast MRI exams at 3- to 6-month intervals. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Surgical resection was strongly recommended if clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression developed. A recursive partitioning (R-PART) algorithm incorporating breast MRI features and endocrine responsiveness was used retrospectively to stratify risk of IDC. A total of 71 patients were enrolled, 2 with bilateral DCIS (73 lesions). A total of 34 (46.6%) were premenopausal, 68 (93.2%) were hormone-receptor positive, and 60 (82.1%) were intermediate- or high-grade lesions. Mean follow-up time was 8.5 years. Over half (52.1%) remained on active surveillance without evidence of IDC with mean duration of 7.4 years. Twenty patients developed IDC, of which 6 were HER2 positive. DCIS and subsequent IDC had highly concordant tumor biology. Risk of IDC was characterized by MRI features after 6 months of endocrine therapy exposure; low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were identified with respective IDC rates of 8.7%, 20.0%, and 68.2%. Thus, active surveillance consisting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and serial breast MRI may be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with DCIS and optimally select medical or surgical management.
SIGNIFICANCE
A retrospective analysis of 71 patients with DCIS who did not undergo upfront surgery demonstrated that breast MRI features after short-term exposure to endocrine therapy identify those at high (68.2%), intermediate (20.0%), and low risk (8.7%) of IDC. With 7.4 years mean follow-up, 52.1% of patients remain on active surveillance. A period of active surveillance offers the opportunity to risk-stratify DCIS lesions and guide decisions for operative management.
View on PubMedRole for Conservative Management in Grade V Renal Trauma.
2022
Authors: Hakam N, Shaw NM, Lui J, Abbasi B, Myers JB, Breyer BN
New evidence for brain cancer risk after a single paediatric CT scan.
2022
Authors: Hamada N, Zablotska LB
Robotic training for medical students: feasibility of a pilot simulation curriculum.
2022
Authors: Greenberg AL, Syed SM, Alseidi A, O'Sullivan PS, Chern H
Influence of progestin-only hormonal use on hepatocellular adenomas: A retrospective cohort study.
2022
Authors: Qureshy Z, Lokken RP, Kakar S, Grab J, Mehta N, Sarkar M
OBJECTIVES
Exogenous estrogen is associated with growth of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), although the influence of progestin-only agents is unknown. We therefore evaluated the association of progestin-only agents on HCA progression compared to no hormone exposure and compared to estrogen exposure in female patients.
STUDY DESIGN
In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of reproductive-aged female patients (ages 16-45) with diagnosed HCAs between 2003 and 2021, we evaluated radiographic HCA growth during discrete periods of well-defined exogenous hormone exposures.
RESULTS
A total of 34 patients were included. Nineteen (55.9%) had follow-up scans during periods without hormone exposure, 7 (20.6%) during estrogen exposure, and 8 (23.5%) during progestin-only exposure. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, percent change in sum of adenoma diameters from baseline to last available scan was -15.0% with progestin-only agents versus 29.4% with estrogen exposure (p = 0.04), and -7.4% with no hormonal exposure (p = 0.52 compared to progestin-only). Greater than 10% growth was observed in two individuals (25.0%) with progestin-only agent use (one patient on high-dose progestin for menorrhagia) versus five individuals (71.4%) with estrogen use (p = 0.13), and 7 (36.8%) with no exogenous hormone use (p = 0.68 vs progestin-only).
CONCLUSIONS
During discrete periods of progestin-only use, HCA growth overall declined, similar to declining growth during periods without exogenous hormonal exposure. This differed from discrete periods of exogenous estrogen exposure, during which time HCAs demonstrated overall increased growth. Though larger studies are needed, these findings support recent guidance supporting progestin-only agents for female patients with HCAs seeking non-estrogen alternatives for contraception.
IMPLICATIONS
In this small retrospective study, we observed overall decrease in HCA size during discrete periods of progestin-only contraception use, similar to that observed during periods without exogenous hormone exposure, supporting their use as a safe alternative to estrogen-containing contraceptives in this patient population.
View on PubMedA Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Addiction/Cardiology Pilot Clinic With Contingency Management for Patients With Stimulant-associated Cardiomyopathy.
2022
Authors: Leyde S, Abbs E, Suen LW, Martin M, Mitchell A, Davis J, Azari S
An Unusual Inverted Talar Neck Fracture-Dislocation.
2022
Authors: Kokubun B, Refaat M
De novo KCNA6 variants with attenuated KV 1.6 channel deactivation in patients with epilepsy.
2022
Authors: Salpietro V, Galassi Deforie V, Efthymiou S, O'Connor E, Marc?-Grau A, Maroofian R, Striano P, Zara F, Morrow MM, SYNAPS Study Group, Reich A, Blevins A, Sala-Coromina J, Accogli A, Fortuna S, Alesandrini M, Au PYB, Singhal NS, Cogne B, Isidor B, Hanna MG, Macaya A, Kullmann DM, Houlden H, M?nnikk? R
Dichotomous regulation of striatal plasticity by dynorphin.
2022
Authors: Yang R, Tuan RRL, Hwang FJ, Bloodgood DW, Kong D, Ding JB
Recovery After Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: How Do Our Patients Really Feel?
2022
Authors: Lee WG, Gosnell JE, Shen WT, Duh QY, Suh I, Chen Y